Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498836›Full record

Observational studyChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026

Using rapid-sequence MRI scans to compare ventricular and intracranial volumes in shunted and non-shunted children with myelomeningocele: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Maya Parker, Oumou Kalsoum Mbacke, Divine Nwafor, Abhishek Kumar, Xue Feng, Ryan Kellogg, David Martin, Amanda Hendrix, Heather Spader

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maya ParkerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA.
Oumou Kalsoum MbackeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA.
Divine NwaforDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA.
Abhishek KumarDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA.
Xue FengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ryan KelloggDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA.
David MartinClaude Moore Health Science Library, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Amanda HendrixDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA.
Heather SpaderDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, 1240 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA. hls3e@uvahealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHydrocephalus is a common complication of myelomeningocele (MMC), typically managed with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). Despite clinical relevance, there remains a paucity of studies quantitatively comparing intracranial and ventricular volumes in shunted versus non-shunted MMC patients. This study aims to determine whether significant volumetric differences exist between these groups.

methodsNinety-one MRIs from 19 MMC patients (13 shunted, 6 non-shunted), aged 0-3 years, were retrospectively analyzed. Volumes were obtained from rapid-sequence MRIs using automatic segmentation with manual correction. Outcomes included ventricular volume, intracranial volume, and ventricle-to-intracranial volume (ventricle/ICV) ratio. Analyses included nonparametric tests, mixed-effects models, bootstrap resampling, permutation testing, and robust regression.

resultsAt baseline, shunted patients exhibited larger intracranial volumes (644.3 vs 403.5 mL; p = 0.020) but not ventricular volumes (82.2 vs 34.2 mL; p = 0.072) compared to non-shunted patients. Although the ventricle-to-intracranial volume ratio was significantly higher in shunted patients under 50 days of age (p = 0.026), this difference was no longer significant after adjusting for head circumference and prematurity (p = 0.144). Sensitivity analyses confirmed differences in the neonatal period (p = 0.013), but not in infancy or toddlerhood. Effect-size analyses demonstrated a large difference within 50 days (Hedges' g = 1.268) that diminished thereafter (g = 0.452).

conclusionShunted MMC patients demonstrated larger intracranial volumes and higher ventricle/ICV ratios in the neonatal period, but these differences diminished after 50 days. Early ventricular enlargement in this cohort's shunted patients appears robust yet transient, with no sustained volumetric differences between shunted and non-shunted patients later in development.

Indexed as

Cerebral VentriclesHydrocephalusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeningomyeloceleVentriculoperitoneal ShuntChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOrgan SizeRetrospective StudiesHydrocephalusSpina bifidaVentricle-to-intracranial volume ratioVentriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID42498836
PMCPMC13400469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.