ReviewPediatric research2026
Paid family leave to promote breastfeeding: catching policy up to the science.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breastfeeding is increasingly recognized as a powerful biologic intervention associated with positive infant and maternal health outcomes. Emerging evidence continues to expand our understanding of the mechanisms through which human milk promotes health, including via immune system development and modulation of antimicrobial resistance. Yet despite the robust scientific evidence supporting breastfeeding as critical to public health, many families in the US face structural barriers to achieving their breastfeeding goals. In the US, paid family leave has been strongly associated with both the initiation of breastfeeding and its duration. Paid family leave has also been associated with improved maternal and infant health, including reduced infant mortality. These findings suggest that paid family leave should be viewed not solely as a labor policy, but as a maternal-child health policy. The US remains one of the few high-income nations without a federal paid family leave program, relying instead on a fragmented patchwork of state policies. State experiences demonstrate that paid family leave can be implemented without major labor market disruption, while public support for a national program remains high. As breastfeeding science continues to advance, federal paid family leave represents overdue public health infrastructure necessary to translate evidence into population-level health improvements. IMPACT: Paid family leave is one of the most effective and well-supported policy mechanisms for promoting breastfeeding success and improving maternal and infant health. This article synthesizes emerging breastfeeding science, including new evidence regarding human milk's influence on neonatal immunity and antimicrobial resistance. We then link breastfeeding research with research on the policy that most supports widespread breastfeeding at a population level: paid family leave. Translating the benefits of breastfeeding into improved public health will require national policies that enable families to achieve breastfeeding goals. Federal paid family leave is among the most evidence-based policy strategies to achieve such goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.