ReviewNature protocols2026
Tutorial: guidance on the use of large language models for medical research.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frontier large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-5, Claude 4.5, Gemini 3, Llama 4 and DeepSeek-R1, represent a transformative class of artificial intelligence tools capable of revolutionizing various aspects of healthcare by generating human-like responses across diverse contexts and adapting to novel tasks following human instructions. Their potential application spans a broad range of medical tasks, such as clinical documentation, matching patients to clinical trials and answering medical questions. Here in this Tutorial, we discuss an actionable set of best practices to help healthcare professionals utilize LLMs more effectively and efficiently. The overall workflow follows sequential phases from formulating the task, choosing the most appropriate LLMs, engineering the prompts, fine-tuning the requests and through to model deployment. We discuss a set of critical considerations in identifying medical tasks that align with the core capabilities of LLMs and selecting models based on the required task, data, performance and model interface. We then review the strategies, such as prompt engineering and fine-tuning, to adapt standard LLMs to specialized medical tasks. We then cover deployment considerations, including regulatory compliance, ethical guidelines and continuous monitoring for fairness and bias. By providing a structured step-by-step methodology, this entry-level tutorial aims to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively integrate LLMs into clinical practice, ensuring that these powerful technologies are applied in a safe, reliable, and impactful manner.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.