ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
The effects of maternal wildfire exposure: a 28-year longitudinal study of Chile wildfires and neonatal outcomes.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWildfires are an increasingly important source of air pollution and environmental stress, yet their impacts on perinatal health in middle-income countries remain poorly understood. Chile has experienced a marked rise in wildfire activity over the last three decades, providing a unique setting to study these associations.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide panel data analysis using a municipality-month panel for 1990-2017 by aggregating individual birth records to municipality-month cells and linking them to municipality-month wildfire indicators in the mother's municipality of residence. Exposure was measured using the number of wildfires, cumulative duration, and burned area. We estimated two-way fixed-effects panel regressions (municipality and year-month) for mean birth weight, newborn length, and gestational age, adjusting for maternal, infant, and contextual characteristics. Wildfire duration was scaled in 24-h increments, and burned area was expressed per hectare to facilitate clinical interpretation.
resultsWildfire exposure during pregnancy was associated with small but potentially meaningful reductions in fetal growth. Each additional 24 h of cumulative wildfire duration in the maternal municipality was associated with an average ≈8-gram lower birth weight (95% CI: -16.8 to 0.7 grams) and a 0.05-cm shorter birth length (95% CI: -0.11 to 0.01 cm). Each additional hectare burned was associated with a reduction of about 0.73 grams in birth weight (95% CI: -0.93 to -0.53) and 0.01 cm in length (95% CI: -0.02 to -0.00).
conclusionsProlonged and extensive wildfires during pregnancy are associated with modest reductions in birth weight and length, particularly when exposure occurs in late gestation. Although individual-level effect sizes are small, they may translate into clinically relevant shifts at the population level in settings experiencing increasingly frequent and severe wildfire seasons. Our findings underscore the importance of monitoring wildfire activity and protecting pregnant women from sustained smoke exposure as part of climate adaptation and perinatal health policies.
Identifiers
42498799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.