ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Generative adversarial networks (GAN) for pre-dilation retinal photograph quality enhancement.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRetinal image quality significantly affects the performance of diagnostic artificial intelligence (AI) models and is typically improved with pupil dilation in clinical settings. However, in real-world settings where dilation is not feasible, suboptimal image quality remains a challenge for AI deployment. In this study, we fine-tuned a CofeNet model to enhance the quality of undilated retinal images.
methodsWe performed pixel-level alignment and fine-tuned a generative CofeNet model using 313 paired and spatially aligned undilated and dilated retinal images. Model performance was evaluated on an internal test (120 image pairs) and two external tests. Image similarity was assessed using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Image gradability was evaluated for undilated and model-enhanced images by three graders on a three-point scale (gradable, force gradable, ungradable), with consensus-based grading. Inter-rater agreement among the three graders was evaluated using Fleiss' kappa (k).
resultsIn the internal test set, PSNR and SSIM improved significantly from 23.2 and 0.823 (undilated) to 28.7 and 0.923 (model-enhanced) when compared to ground truth dilated images (both p < 0.001). The gradability of the images improved from 41% (49 of 120 images) to 76% after enhancement, although the inter-rater agreement decreased (overall Fleiss' κ from 0.397 to 0.234). Similar trends were observed in the external tests.
conclusionThe enhanced images demonstrated improved quality and greater structural similarity to dilated images, suggesting the potential of the CofeNet model as an alternative approach to enhance image quality. Further validation is necessary to determine its clinical utility.
Identifiers
42498776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.