Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498772›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A hybrid convolutional-transformer neural network model for photovoltaic fault detection and localization.

Ebrahim A Ramadan, Nada M Moawad, Belal A Abouzalam, Wessam F Abouzaid, Ghada M El-Banby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ebrahim A RamadanDepartment of Industrial Electronics and Control Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, 32952, Egypt.
Nada M MoawadDepartment of Electrical Engineering of Computer and Control Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt. Nada_Hanfy2011@eng.kfs.edu.eg.
Belal A AbouzalamDepartment of Industrial Electronics and Control Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, 32952, Egypt.
Wessam F AbouzaidDepartment of Electrical Engineering of Computer and Control Systems, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt.
Ghada M El-BanbyDepartment of Industrial Electronics and Control Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, 32952, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy retention from losses is the primary goal of fault detection methodology for photovoltaic (PV) solar systems. A fault detection model should be designed effectively to minimize power and cost waste. We propose a novel fault detection and localization method that leverages deep learning techniques for PV systems. The model is a hybrid semantic segmentation method that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and multi-level transformer neural networks. We examine our model on four different segmentation datasets, which have varied characteristics and different capturing conditions, to ensure our model generalization. Using aerial inspection, the first thermal dataset images give a high performance in locating the faulty cells in PV arrays with an accuracy and global precision of 99.89%, a mean average precision (mAP) of 88.73%, a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 76.29%, and 84.48% of mean dice (mDice, or mean/unweighted F1 score). We use three electroluminescence datasets to investigate the precise location and class of different fault types and minor cracks at the cell level. The second dataset result achieved perfect detection and segmentation of anomaly areas in cells with 99% accuracy, 96.36% mIoU, 98.13% mDice, and 98.41% mAP. The first two datasets contain binary segmentation images with fault and no-fault classes; to accommodate multiple classes, we have utilized the third and fourth datasets. The third dataset, comprising five PV failure classes, is evaluated against other models, yielding a superior performance of 96.27% precision, 77.64% mAP, 57.3% mIoU, and 68.45% mDice. The final dataset has 29 segmentation classes for testing 25 classes, for which it achieves a precision of 95.05%, 66.7% mAP, 49.3% mIoU, and 59.3% mDice.

Identifiers

PMID42498772
PMCPMC13400736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.