ArticleScientific reports2026
The relative importance of resilience factors prior, during, and after stress-inducing exams in medical students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resilience is a dynamic process of adapting to stress. Identifying modifiable resilience factors (RFs) remains challenging due to the difficulty of studying individuals before, during, and after a stressor in real time. We addressed this by investigating modifiable protective factors in the context of university exams, a predictable and impactful stressor, and focused on medical students to examine RFs in a vulnerable cohort under standardized conditions. In this exploratory study, we used data from the three-wave 'RESIST' Study involving 451 medical students from the UK. Our investigation covered three timepoints with differing levels of stress (1) a non-exam period, (2) an exam period, and (3) post-exams at the end of the term. We examined the distinct impact of 13 modifiable RFs at individual, family, and community levels. Specifically, we investigated their relative importance and their cumulative impact with regard to self-reported mental health symptoms at three timepoints. We found the highest relative importance rankings for self-esteem, brooding, and distress tolerance. While most individual resilience factors had negligible-to-small effects, the sum of all 13 effects was similar to the effects of self-reported mental health symptoms at the previous timepoint on themselves. Our findings shed light on the role of RFs, and their cumulative and timing effects, and their associations with exam-related self-reported mental health problems among medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.