ArticleScientific reports2026
FRED enables standardized FAIR metadata generation and management for omics research.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific research relies on transparent dissemination of data and its associated interpretations, including raw data, metadata, experimental design, and data processing details. Production and handling of research data represents an ongoing challenge, extending beyond publication into individual facilities, institutes and research groups, often termed Research Data Management (RDM). It is foundational to scientific discovery and aligned with the FAIR principles. Although the majority of peer-reviewed journals require raw data deposition in public repositories in alignment with FAIR principles, metadata frequently lacks standardization, hindering effective utilization and sharing of research findings. Here we present FRED, a generalized toolkit for FAIR metadata management in omics research based on a flexible, machine-readable YAML format. FRED enables (i) guided, dialog-based creation of metadata files, (ii) structured semantic validation, (iii) logical cross-file search, (iv) API-based integration with external systems, and (v) self-hosted web deployment. We demonstrate the utility of FRED through a complete annotation workflow applied to a published single-nucleus RNA-seq dataset, covering metadata generation, validation, repository-based discovery, and export to NCBI GEO submission format. FRED is designed for non-computational scientists and specialized facilities alike, and integrates into existing RDM infrastructure without requiring dedicated IT resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.