ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Tactile stimulus discrimination in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a behavioral and neurophysiological study.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Body image disturbance (BID) is a key symptom of anorexia nervosa (AN) and involves body size overestimation. Although this overestimation might be related to perceptual deficits, little is known about tactile perception in AN. To clarify the role of putative tactile deficits in BID, the present study investigated 36 adolescent female AN patients and 41 matched healthy controls (HC) using a tactile oddball paradigm during parallel EEG and MEG (EMEG) measurement. Tactile perception was behaviorally tested via the Touch Test (tactile perception threshold), a deviant count task, and a tactile stimulus discrimination task. Compared to HC participants, AN patients had similar tactile perception thresholds, but performance in the deviant count task and the tactile stimulus discrimination task was poor. Non-parametric cluster permutation tests on estimated neural source activity of evoked EMEG responses revealed that AN patients and HC did not differ regarding the neural differentiation between deviant and standard stimuli (oddball effect). However, estimated neural activity was globally reduced in the inferior temporal cortex and (by trend) in the posterior parietal cortex. These findings argue against the idea that behavioral discrimination deficits of tactile stimuli in AN are grounded in neural stimulus discrimination deficits. Instead, the overall reduced neural activity in the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex might reflect aberrant integration of neural tactile representations into a coherent multisensory body representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.