Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498669›Full record

RevieweNeuro2026

Sustaining Drug Discovery Amid the Limits of Alzheimer's Disease Immunotherapies.

Amina McDiarmid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amina McDiarmidTherapeutic Discovery, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom amcdiar2@ed.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-5865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulation of insoluble extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intraneuronal fibrillary hyperphosphorylated tau fibrils in the brain are widely believed to contribute to the progressive neurodegeneration and neuronal loss characteristic of the Alzheimer's disease and the associated dementia. Anti-amyloid immunotherapies that reduce cerebral Aβ burden in affected individuals have been approved based on biological outcomes from clinical trials. However, the extent to which Aβ clearance translates into improved meaningful clinical, cognitive, and functional benefit versus risk and cost is unclear based on available data. Here, the critical barriers that limit the impact of anti-amyloid immunotherapies, including aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab, are discussed. Treatment slows cognitive decline by ∼20-30% in certain patient subsets, but absolute improvements in cognitive and functional outcomes remain modest. Independent analyses of how treatment impacts health span suggests statistically significant trial results may not translate into significant real-world benefit. Response is most significant in cases of early-stage disease where levels of copathology tau are low. Edema and brain hemorrhage occur frequently, particularly in carriers of

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDrug DiscoveryImmunotherapyAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsHumansAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer’s diseasedrug discoveryimmunotherapyneurosciencenovel treatmentstranslational science

Identifiers

PMID42498669
PMCPMC13406310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.