RevieweNeuro2026
Sustaining Drug Discovery Amid the Limits of Alzheimer's Disease Immunotherapies.
Review in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulation of insoluble extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intraneuronal fibrillary hyperphosphorylated tau fibrils in the brain are widely believed to contribute to the progressive neurodegeneration and neuronal loss characteristic of the Alzheimer's disease and the associated dementia. Anti-amyloid immunotherapies that reduce cerebral Aβ burden in affected individuals have been approved based on biological outcomes from clinical trials. However, the extent to which Aβ clearance translates into improved meaningful clinical, cognitive, and functional benefit versus risk and cost is unclear based on available data. Here, the critical barriers that limit the impact of anti-amyloid immunotherapies, including aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab, are discussed. Treatment slows cognitive decline by ∼20-30% in certain patient subsets, but absolute improvements in cognitive and functional outcomes remain modest. Independent analyses of how treatment impacts health span suggests statistically significant trial results may not translate into significant real-world benefit. Response is most significant in cases of early-stage disease where levels of copathology tau are low. Edema and brain hemorrhage occur frequently, particularly in carriers of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.