Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498462›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2026

Development and Testing of a Novel Stabilizer Clamp to Reduce Motion During Instrumented Cervical Fusions: The Caption System.

Christopher T Martin, Vincent Rossi, Martin Pham, Deb Bhowmick, Rex Armstrong, Mark Grizzard, Amber Pulido, Daniel Woods, Jeremy Rawlinson, Domagoj Coric

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christopher T MartinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA mart1865@umn.edu.
Vincent RossiCarolina Neurosurgery and Spine, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Martin PhamDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Deb BhowmickDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Rex ArmstrongMedtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA.
Mark GrizzardMedtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA.
Amber PulidoMedtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA.
Daniel WoodsMedtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jeremy RawlinsonMedtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA.
Domagoj CoricCarolina Neurosurgery and Spine, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNavigation of spinal instrumentation is heavily dependent on maintaining an accurate registration of the local anatomy to the navigation software. Any motion of the anatomy reduces accuracy. Historically, navigation in the cervical spine has been limited by the mobile nature of the anatomy. Here, we describe the development and testing of a novel stabilizer clamp designed to reduce motion and improve stability for navigated-instrumentation accuracy.

methodsTesting was completed both on a flat-top table and separately on a Jackson table. On both tables, the cadaveric specimen was positioned prone with a Mayfield clamp. A total of 30 trials were completed as 3 repeats over 10 applications with force in the anteroposterior (AP) direction, and 30 additional trials with force in the medial-lateral (ML) direction. Displacement was recorded using a digital motion indicator for each trial. The experiment was then repeated after the addition application of a novel cranial stabilization system (Caption device).

resultsThe Caption cranial stabilizer significantly reduced both AP motion (45%-53% reduction) and ML motion (69%-92% reduction;

conclusionsThe addition of a supplementary cranial stabilization system significantly reduces cranial motion compared with the use of only a Mayfield clamp. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increased stability of the cranial and cervical anatomy may allow for a reduction in malposition of navigated cervical instrumentation. Particular benefit may be seen in minimally invasive cases where the bony anatomy cannot be directly visualized, and in placement of cervical pedicle screws where the anatomic tolerances required are very high. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5:

Indexed as

cervical; cervical pedicle screw; pedicle inlet trajectoryfusionminimally invasive

Identifiers

PMID42498462
PMCPMC13670967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.