Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498281›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2026

Long-term outcomes with continuous venetoclax for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Sean McKeague, Thomas E Lew, Anna Lowe, Leishong Lau, Philip A Thompson, Ashley Whitechurch, Dennis Carney, Max Wolf, Gemma Reynolds, Piers Blombery and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sean McKeagueClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3280-0120
Thomas E LewClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6804-2432
Anna LoweClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Leishong LauClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Philip A ThompsonClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2086-6031
Ashley WhitechurchClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Dennis CarneyClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3239-6065
Max WolfClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Gemma ReynoldsClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Piers BlomberyClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
John F SeymourClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2188-6835
Andrew W RobertsClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Mary Ann AndersonClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3515-0215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractVenetoclax was first approved for continuous use in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but the efficacy and consequences of very long-term BCL2 inhibition are unknown. We describe the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with R/R CLL treated with >5 years of continuous venetoclax. Long-term responders (>5 years of continuous therapy without progressive disease [PD]) were identified from a cohort of 86 patients with R/R CLL treated with continuous venetoclax with or without rituximab. Landmark analyses at 2 and 5 years assessed association between undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD; 10-4 peripheral blood flow cytometry) and progression-free survival (PFS). Next-generation sequencing was performed at PD for BCL2 and TP53 mutations. Twenty-nine patients (33%) were long-term responders. Compared to those with PD within 5 years, they were more likely to have mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (44% vs 14%; P = .029), noncomplex karyotype (89 vs 50%; P = .043), and uMRD (79 vs 30%; P< .001). At a median follow-up of 11.1 years, 76% had discontinued venetoclax, mostly due to PD. In a landmark analysis of patients continuing venetoclax beyond 2 years, 5-year PFS was 87% for those with uMRD vs 45% without (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.52; P = .001). BCL2 mutations were detected in 4 of 8 patients at PD. Grade ≥3 toxicities, including infection (51%), neutropenia (20%), and thrombocytopenia (10%), occurred at consistent frequency throughout treatment. Long-term responses to continuous venetoclax occur in approximately one-third of patients with R/R CLL. Sustained uMRD confers the most favorable outcomes, although all patients show a continuous risk of relapse, infection, and cytopenias.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellSulfonamidesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2RecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Sulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID42498281
PMCPMC13634113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.