Trial reportAnnals of neurology2026
Age Is an Effect Modifier of Thrombectomy Benefit in a Socioeconomically Vulnerable Stroke Population.
Trial report in Annals of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRandomized trials from high-income countries have shown that endovascular treatment (EVT) yields similar benefits in elderly and non-elderly patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). However, evidence from low/middle-income countries remains scarce. We aimed to assess the impact of age on outcomes and determine whether age modifies the effect of EVT under the resource-limited conditions of a public healthcare system in a developing country.
methodsPre-specified subgroup analysis of the RESILIENT trial, a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in Brazil comparing EVT versus medical treatment alone in anterior circulation LVOS. Patients were categorized as non-elderly (<70 years), elderly (≥70 years), and very elderly (≥80 years). The primary endpoint was functional independence (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at 90 days. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of outcome and to assess age as an effect modifier.
resultsAmong 221 randomized patients (47.1% females; median [IQR] National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 18 [14-21]), 89 (40.2%) were elderly and 37 (16.7%) very elderly. Increasing age was independently associated with lower odds of functional independence in the entire study population (odds ratio [OR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.99, p = 0.01). Age significantly modified the treatment effect of EVT. Non-elderly patients derived substantial benefit from EVT (OR: 4.08; 95% CI: 1.71-9.76), whereas the benefit was attenuated in elderly (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.17-5.42; p
interpretationThe effect of EVT appears significantly diminished among elderly patients in a public healthcare system in a developing country. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanism underlying these findings and properly assess the efficacy of EVT in this vulnerable population. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:644-652.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.