ReviewProgress in retinal and eye research2026
Seeing anew: Mechanisms, outcomes, and challenges in adapting to restored sight via visual prostheses.
Review in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bionic vision technologies: progress and perspectives on retinal prostheses and optogenetics for the treatment of advanced retinal degeneration.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restoring vision through prosthetic devices represents one of the most ambitious frontiers in translational neuroscience. Despite decades of progress, functional outcomes remain highly variable, often falling short of patient expectations, as adapting to restored vision through visual prostheses is a complex process influenced by neural plasticity, perceptual learning, and psychological factors. We propose a five-stage framework that captures the hierarchically dependent yet fragile process of adaptation: Device Activation, Perceptual Calibration, Cognitive Integration, Behavioral Generalization, and Psychosocial Adjustment. Across retinal and cortical prosthesis designs, the earlier stages are frequently achieved, but progression to fluent, real-world use and sustained device acceptance is far less common. The most consistent point of failure lies between Cognitive Integration and Behavioral Generalization: skills acquired in structured training rarely transfer to unconstrained everyday behavior. Technical constraints, insufficient training, and unrealistic expectations frequently stall adaptation at this threshold, leading to frustration, limited daily use, or device abandonment. By examining visual-prosthesis clinical trials, case studies of surgical vision restoration, and evidence from cochlear implants and sensory substitution devices, we identify key determinants of successful adaptation: timely intervention, intuitive device usability, sustained rehabilitation, and long-term psychosocial support. Understanding the mechanisms of adaptation is essential for improving visual prostheses and ultimately enhancing quality of life for individuals with restored sight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.