Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42498067›Full record

ReviewProgress in retinal and eye research2026

Seeing anew: Mechanisms, outcomes, and challenges in adapting to restored sight via visual prostheses.

Katerina Eleonora K Rassia, Lydia Liapi, John S Pezaris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katerina Eleonora K RassiaDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Lydia LiapiDepartment of Psychology, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece.
John S PezarisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: pezaris.john@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Phosphene Characteristics and Artificial SightR01EY027888 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PEZARIS, JOHN S. · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoring vision through prosthetic devices represents one of the most ambitious frontiers in translational neuroscience. Despite decades of progress, functional outcomes remain highly variable, often falling short of patient expectations, as adapting to restored vision through visual prostheses is a complex process influenced by neural plasticity, perceptual learning, and psychological factors. We propose a five-stage framework that captures the hierarchically dependent yet fragile process of adaptation: Device Activation, Perceptual Calibration, Cognitive Integration, Behavioral Generalization, and Psychosocial Adjustment. Across retinal and cortical prosthesis designs, the earlier stages are frequently achieved, but progression to fluent, real-world use and sustained device acceptance is far less common. The most consistent point of failure lies between Cognitive Integration and Behavioral Generalization: skills acquired in structured training rarely transfer to unconstrained everyday behavior. Technical constraints, insufficient training, and unrealistic expectations frequently stall adaptation at this threshold, leading to frustration, limited daily use, or device abandonment. By examining visual-prosthesis clinical trials, case studies of surgical vision restoration, and evidence from cochlear implants and sensory substitution devices, we identify key determinants of successful adaptation: timely intervention, intuitive device usability, sustained rehabilitation, and long-term psychosocial support. Understanding the mechanisms of adaptation is essential for improving visual prostheses and ultimately enhancing quality of life for individuals with restored sight.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalVisual ProsthesisHumansNeuronal PlasticityProsthesis DesignVisual PerceptionArtificial visionPerceptual learningSensory substitutionSkill transferVisual plasticityVisual rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42498067
PMCPMC13585466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.