ArticleEBioMedicine2026
COVID-19 vaccination timing, relative to acute COVID-19, and subsequent risk of long COVID.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVaccination is a vital tool in preventing acute COVID-19 and may confer additional protection against Long COVID, although it is unclear whether this protection wanes over time.
methodsWe assessed electronic health record (EHR) data from a national, retrospective cohort of patients, comparing the 12-month cumulative incidence of Long COVID (ICD-10 code U09.9) among (A) patients who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated (two or more versus zero doses) and (B) patients diagnosed with acute COVID-19 1-3 months, 3-5 months, or 5-7 months after vaccination.
findingsIn our binary cohort (n = 519,980), we found that patients who were vaccinated had a lower risk of Long COVID (adjusted risk ratio 0.84 (0.81, 0.88)) or mortality (adjusted risk ratio 0.83 (0.81, 0.86)) than patients who were unvaccinated. In our longitudinal cohort (n = 1,085,291), we did not find significant heterogeneity in Long COVID risk during the seven months following vaccination.
interpretationWe found that COVID-19 vaccination was protective against Long COVID, and we did not observe a significant waning of this protection within seven months after vaccination.
fundingThis research was financially supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1K01AI182501 to Zachary Butzin-Dozier) and a Global Development grant (OPP1165144) from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Individual authors were supported by the following funding sources: NIMHR01131542 (PI Rena C. Patel), Jerrod Anzalone is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, U54 GM115458, which funds the Great Plains IDeA-CTR Network. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.