Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42497407›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

AI-Generated Personalized Visualization of the Safe Place in Virtual Reality vs Traditional Safe Place Imagery: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Franziska Griessenauer, Franziska Pfannerstill, Thomas Probst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Franziska Griessenauer *Division of Psychotherapy and Psychotherapy Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4660-5565
Franziska Pfannerstill *Division of Psychotherapy and Psychotherapy Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8514-4691
Thomas ProbstDivision of Psychotherapy and Psychotherapy Research, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-2133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelaxation techniques, such as the "safe place" imagery exercise, are simple and accessible strategies to cope with the negative effects of stress. While virtual reality (VR) has been applied in relaxation research, it is still unclear whether it enhances the relaxing effect of such exercises or is merely an alternative and similarly effective form of delivery.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether the use of VR enhances the relaxing effect of the safe place imagery exercise by generating an individualized virtual environment representing each participant's personal safe place with AI. Additionally, the roles of imagery vividness, presence, and satisfaction with the AI-generated safe place were examined.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial involved a single laboratory session with 4 measurement points followed by a 5-day online follow-up period involving daily self-report questionnaires. A total of 60 adults were randomly assigned to the experimental condition or the control condition. In the experimental condition, participants engaged in the safe place imagery exercise in which they imagined a place where they feel completely safe and comfortable, followed by a stress induction task. Then, participants completed a 3-minute relaxation period within an AI-generated virtual environment representing their personal safe place, which was created based on their individual descriptions. In the control condition, the same procedures were implemented; however, in the 3-minute relaxation period, participants imagined their safe place with their eyes closed. The primary outcome was self-reported relaxation, assessed with the Relaxation State Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included imagery vividness (assessed with the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire), presence (assessed with the Igroup Presence Questionnaire), satisfaction with the AI-generated safe place, and use of the safe place in everyday life.

resultsThe 3-minute relaxation period of both conditions enhanced self-reported relaxation levels with no statistically significant differences between conditions, indicating that relaxation in VR did not outperform traditional mental imagery. Relaxation levels during the 5-day online follow-up period likewise did not differ significantly between conditions, and there were no significant differences in the frequency with which participants used their safe place during the follow-up period. Imagery vividness was positively associated with postintervention relaxation in both conditions, whereas satisfaction with the AI-generated safe place and presence in the virtual environment did not predict outcomes.

conclusionsWhile relaxation in the AI-generated safe place in VR was effective in promoting relaxation, it did not demonstrate a benefit compared to traditional mental imagery, either immediately after the intervention or during the follow-up period. These findings suggest that VR may represent an effective alternative form of delivery, but not a superior enhancement, for brief relaxation interventions. Future developments might increase the potential of AI and VR as effective tool for promoting relaxation.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/BP53A; https://osf.io/bp53a/overview.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceimagery exerciserelaxationsafe placevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42497407
PMCPMC13451872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.