ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Clinically Interpretable Deep Learning for Differentiating Vitiligo and Postinflammatory Hypopigmentation: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distinguishing vitiligo from postinflammatory hypopigmentation (PIH) is clinically challenging because both conditions may present with similar depigmented lesions. Although deep learning has shown strong potential for dermatologic image classification, limited interpretability remains a barrier to clinical adoption. Objective: This study aimed to develop an interpretable deep learning framework for accurate differentiation between vitiligo and PIH using a lightweight convolutional neural network and an ensemble of explainability methods. Methods: A total of 332 clinical images (176 vitiligo and 156 PIH) were collected from King Abdullah University Hospital and publicly available online sources. Images were preprocessed and evaluated using patient-wise 5-fold cross-validation to eliminate patient-level data leakage. A pretrained MobileNetV2 model was fine-tuned by unfreezing the final 30 layers. To enhance interpretability, gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM), integrated gradients, and smooth gradients (SmoothGrad) were combined into an equal-weight ensemble explanation framework. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The proposed model achieved an overall accuracy of 94.88%, macroaveraged precision of 94.88%, recall of 94.84%, F1-score of 94.86%, and an AUC of 0.9885 across the 5 validation folds. The ensemble framework produced clinically meaningful explanations in 98.48% of a representative 66-image validation subset used for interpretability analysis. Conclusions: The proposed framework combines high diagnostic performance with robust interpretability for distinguishing vitiligo from PIH. By integrating multiple complementary explanation methods, the approach enhances clinical transparency and may support dermatologists in the differential diagnosis of pigmentary disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.