ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Predictive Inference Alterations in Psychosis Proneness Show Task-Dependent Signatures.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preparing to act follows Bayesian inference rules.iScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perception relies on the dynamic integration of sensory inputs with prior expectations shaped by recent experience. Disruptions in this inferential process are thought to underlie psychosis, yet whether similar alterations occur in subclinical psychosis-like experiences (PLEs) and how they manifest across perceptual contexts remain unclear. Here, we tested two independent samples of healthy adults: 80 performed a visual detection task and 62 a motion discrimination task. Mixed-effects models revealed that higher PLE scores predicted reduced weighting of sensory evidence and greater reliance on probabilistic cues across tasks. Complementary signal detection analyses confirmed that higher PLE scores were associated with reduced perceptual sensitivity, alongside increased cue-dependent response bias shifts. To capture how recent experience shapes perception, we quantified history biases: the influence of the previous stimulus or choice on current decisions. These biases diverged across contexts: in the detection task, the repulsive bias from the previous stimulus was attenuated in high-PLE individuals, whereas in the discrimination task, they exhibited a repulsive bias away from previous choices. These task-dependent signatures reveal that psychosis-like traits differentially alter the use of past information, pointing to a broader inferential vulnerability along the psychosis continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.