Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42497286›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Multi-view graph-regularized deep metric subspace clustering network.

Pengpeng Luo, Ming Yang, Chong Peng, Qianqian Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengpeng LuoCollege of Mathematical Sciences, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, PR China.
Ming YangCollege of Mathematical Sciences, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1810-1566
Chong PengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong, PR China.
Qianqian WangSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-view subspace clustering has progressed significantly by using deep neural networks to handle nonlinear data representations. A recent advancement, the Multi-view Self-Expressive Subspace Clustering (MSESC) network, achieves markedly higher computational efficiency by substituting the traditional self-expression layer with a deep metric learning approach. Nevertheless, MSESC still suffers from two notable limitations: it fails to adequately capture the high-order geometric structures inherent in multi-view data, and it lacks effective guidance from the underlying clustering distribution. To overcome these shortcomings, we propose a novel framework termed Multi-View Graph Regularized Deep Metric Subspace Clustering (MVGR-DMSC). The proposed method introduces two key components into MSESC to enhance the discriminability of representations. First, a dual-order graph regularization module is devised to maintain both first-order and second-order manifold structures, thereby allowing the model to capture more complex local geometric relationships. Second, an adaptive view-weighted deep clustering module is incorporated, which employs the Kullback-Leibler divergence to guide representation learning while dynamically adjusting the contributions of different views. Through evaluations on five benchmark datasets, we show that MVGR-DMSC consistently yields better results than several state-of-the-art approaches, including the direct baseline MSESC, in both accuracy and robustness.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsGraph Neural NetworksHumans

Identifiers

PMID42497286
PMCPMC13399512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.