ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
CellExLink: End-to-end cell-type recognition and normalization in biomedical text.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CellExLink: End-to-end cell-type recognition and normalization in biomedical text.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell types are described in biomedical literature using diverse names, abbreviations, and phenotype phrases, which complicates their recognition and normalization. We developed CellExLink, an end-to-end pipeline that identifies cell-type mentions and normalizes them to Cell Ontology (CL) identifiers. The recognizer was fine-tuned and evaluated on five heterogeneous biomedical corpora spanning full-length articles, article excerpts, figure captions, abstracts, and anatomical text passages. These resources include fine-grained phenotype-defined populations, heterogeneous cell populations, and abbreviated mentions. Across the five corpora, CellExLink achieved macro-average exact- and relaxed-span F1 scores of 0.766 and 0.855, respectively. For CL identifier normalization on gold-standard mention spans, F1 scores ranged from 0.690 to 0.874. In strict end-to-end evaluation, which required both an exact mention span and the correct CL identifier, F1 scores ranged from 0.552 on a figure-caption corpus to 0.725 on a corpus of full-text article excerpts. CellExLink outperformed the evaluated off-the-shelf systems in cell mention recognition, CL identifier normalization, and end-to-end extraction. By converting unannotated biomedical text into cell-type spans linked to standardized CL identifiers, CellExLink provides a practical foundation for downstream applications, including literature curation, relation extraction, and knowledge graph construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.