ArticlePloS one2026
Fundus image analysis of retinitis pigmentosa using artificial intelligence.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A self-supervised learning method for detection of retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a group of inherited retinal diseases that are caused by genetic defects that lead to progressive photoreceptor loss and eventual blindness. Early diagnosis would be helpful for effective management of the disease; however, many patients stay unaware of early symptoms. Meanwhile, fundus images are widely obtained during routine medical checkups but are underused for detecting RP. This study explores the effectiveness of finetuning deep learning models, pre-trained for general visual tasks, to identify RP from color fundus images. The dataset comprised 321 color fundus images from 201 Japanese subjects at Keio University Hospital, including 200 images from 107 patients with retinitis pigmentosa and 121 images from 94 non-retinitis pigmentosa subjects. Multiple images were available for some subjects. Using transfer learning, pretrained convolutional neural network models -VGG16, Resnet50, and InceptionV3- were finetuned to detect RP. As a result, Inception V3 achieved the best accuracy of 96.97%, which matches the average diagnostic accuracy of ophthalmologists. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) suggested that the model attended to clinically relevant fundus regions, including the peripheral retina and posterior pole, which may reflect features such as peripheral degenerative changes and retinal vascular attenuation. These findings support the potential interpretability of the finetuned model and suggest that deep learning may assist ophthalmologists in RP screening as a supportive tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.