ArticlePloS one2026
Construction of a fine-grained retrieval model for archival text-image based on the integration of scene graph generation and attention mechanism.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To tackle the challenges in fine-grained retrieval stemming from noise, official seal occlusions, small text blocks, and other issues prevalent in archival text images, and to fulfill the requirements of integrating both textual and visual dual features while enhancing retrieval accuracy and efficiency, this study has devised a five-tier architectural model. This model comprises an input layer, a preprocessing layer, a scene graph generation layer, an attention fusion layer, and a retrieval matching layer. The model incorporates a dedicated scene graph generation module tailored for archival data, aiming to enhance element detection. Additionally, it features a three-tier attention fusion module that integrates scene graph, text, and cross-modal features to ensure precise feature alignment. Training is carried out using a multi-task loss function, and an index is created to streamline retrieval and matching processes. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves a Top-1 accuracy of 83.7% and an average precision of 88.3% on the test set, representing a 25.1% improvement over the Top-1 accuracy of an optical character recognition (OCR) combined with word frequency and inverse document frequency model. The proposed model achieves a Top-1 accuracy of 6.1% higher than the archival retrieval network model for examples with official seal occlusion and a Top-1 accuracy of 76.8% for small text blocks. The response time for a single retrieval is 52.6ms. Research provides technical support for efficient retrieval of large-scale archives in archives, effectively solving the problem of archive retrieval in complex scenarios, and significantly improving the efficiency of archive management and utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.