ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Assessing the policy and institutional framework for multisectoral governance and accountability in emergency preparedness and response in Ethiopia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public health emergencies place sustained pressure on health systems, particularly where effective coordination across sectors and levels of governance is required. Although Ethiopia has established policy frameworks and coordination mechanisms aligned with global initiatives, evidence on how these arrangements function in practice remains limited. This study assessed multisector governance for public health emergency preparedness and response, focusing on accountability, coordination, institutional roles, and implementation. A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted in Ethiopia between July and September 2025. Quantitative data were collected through a cross-sectional survey of 74 stakeholders from institutions involved in emergency preparedness and response across the health, disaster risk management, agriculture, livestock, academic, and partner sectors. Governance was assessed across seven predefined domains using 5-point Likert-scale measures, with domain scores summarized using descriptive institutional maturity categories. Qualitative data from purposively selected key informants were analyzed thematically to contextualize and explain quantitative findings. The survey achieved a response rate of 92.5%. The overall perceived governance maturity score was 3.31, corresponding to the predefined functional category. Most governance domains were rated as functional, whereas policy framework implementation remained at the emerging level. Qualitative findings indicated that national guidelines and coordination platforms were widely recognized, but their implementation varied across administrative levels. Persistent challenges included role ambiguity, inconsistent coordination and reporting practices, weak feedback mechanisms, and uneven implementation of policy and legal frameworks, particularly at subnational levels, where governance frequently relied on adaptive and informal practices. Overall, Ethiopia has established a functional institutional foundation for multisector emergency governance; however, important policy-to-practice gaps remain. Strengthening operational guidance, coordination, accountability, and implementation across administrative levels will be essential to improve emergency preparedness and response.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.