Trial reportPloS one2026
Effect of midwifery students' continuity of care program on women's experiences of maternity care: A randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMidwifery continuity of care (CoC) benefits women and families. Engaging midwifery students may help extend such care and improve access to quality maternity services. This study evaluated the impact of a student-led CoC on women's maternity care experiences during childbirth in a middle-income country. No trials to date have assessed these effects.
methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial with low-risk pregnant women at 26-29 weeks of gestation, intending vaginal delivery. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 45) or control (n = 48) groups through stratified block randomization with central allocation concealment. The intervention group received continuous care from final-year midwifery students, while both groups received usual care. Childbirth experiences were assessed 40-50 days postpartum using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-2), while secondary outcomes were measured with the Experience of Maternity Care and Maternal Satisfaction scales.
resultsAll recruited women were followed up, and baseline characteristics were comparable. In the intervention group, 12 women (27%) had caesarean sections compared to 18 women (38%) in the control group. Among women with experience of labour pain at the hospital (37 intervention, 35 control), the intervention group reported higher mean childbirth experience scores (3.3 vs. 2.3; adjusted mean difference [AMD] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 1.3). The intervention group scored higher in maternity care experiences during pregnancy (AMD 15.7; 95% CI 13.3 to 18.2), labour and birth (35.6 vs. 23.0; AMD 12.6, 95% CI 7.9 to 17.4), and postnatal care (45.1 vs. 28.2, AMD 17.1; 95% CI 14.0 to 20.2). Maternal satisfaction was greater for normal (187 vs. 130; AMD 56, 95% CI 45-68) and caesarean (162 vs. 130, AMD 30, 95% CI 11-50) births among women in the intervention group.
conclusionsUndergraduate midwifery students were able to provide CoC that improved women's experiences of maternity care. These findings are promising for further research and practical implementation. Trial registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20100414003706N41, registered prospectively on 30 April 2022, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT20100414003706N41; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/62761.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.