SynthesisPloS one2026
Analysis of swimming teaching programs, aquatic competencies and specific skills in school settings from early childhood to secondary education: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The teaching of swimming in school contexts has become increasingly important due to the benefits in the integral development of students and the prevention of aquatic accidents.This study analyses, by means of a systematic review, the aquatic teaching programmes and Competencies implemented in school settings over the last 25 years, from infant to secondary education. The Methodological approach was based on the PRISMA guidelines, with searches in scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, Sport Discus and Web of Science) and secondary sources. Sixteen studies were selected according to the PICOS model, assessed with the STROBE and TREND tools. The results show a predominance of technical-utilitarian approaches focused on specific swimming skills, with little curricular integration and limited involvement of PE teachers. Most of the studies focused on infant and primary school, being scarce in secondary school. A high variability in duration, frequency, Contents and Assessment instruments was evidenced. The studies highlight the need for greater inclusion of swimming in school curricula, with more comprehensive pedagogical approaches adapted to each stage. It is concluded that although progress has been made, systematic implementation is still limited, requiring greater institutional support, teacher training and methodological coherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.