Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42497123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

It takes a village: Community science informs tick encounter, pathogen, and exposure risk in North Carolina, USA.

Dayvion R Adams, Kane Lawhorn, Allison N Yackley, Kaylin S Lewandowski, Martha O Burford Reiskind, Alexis M Barbarin, Michael H Reiskind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dayvion R AdamsDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-3650
Kane LawhornDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-7369
Allison N YackleyDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kaylin S LewandowskiDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Martha O Burford ReiskindGenetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-9215
Alexis M BarbarinCommunicable Disease Branch, Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Michael H ReiskindDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As tick-borne disease cases continue to increase over time, there is a growing need to understand the ecological and epidemiological factors that contribute to disease risk. North Carolina is currently experiencing a rise in cases, yet tick-borne research in the state remains limited. In this study, we developed a framework for a community science program in collaboration with 22 county public health agencies to recruit participants to submit incidentally encountered ticks. As part of kit submissions, participants also completed a form describing where and when they encountered the tick, as well as the behaviors that led to the encounters. Submitted ticks were tested for several putative bacterial pathogens, including Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia spp., and Rickettsia amblyommatis. We additionally assessed how advertising methodology and frequency by county health agencies influenced tick kit submissions and evaluated correlations between agency perceptions of project performance and submission rates. Over two years, we received 444 ticks across 319 unique submissions. While species distributions were largely consistent with prior observations, we report the first published instance of Amblyomma americanum within the mountainous region of NC, indicating a potential range expansion into cooler, higher-altitude areas. Relative risk modeling identified recreational activities as consistently associated with higher likelihood of tick kit submissions. Multiple advertising types appeared to influence the number of kits submitted; however, these results should be interpreted cautiously due to small sample sizes. Overall, our study demonstrates a successful collaboration with state and county health agencies to engage the community in tick-borne disease research. Future studies should build on this framework to further optimize participation.

Indexed as

Tick-Borne DiseasesTicksAmblyommaAnimalsBorrelia burgdorferiEhrlichiaHumansNorth CarolinaRickettsia

Identifiers

PMID42497123
PMCPMC13399343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.