ArticleAge and ageing2026
Costs and cost-effectiveness of palliative care in residential aged care homes: a scoping review.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalliative care is increasingly recognised as a core component of healthcare delivery in residential aged care (RAC) homes, yet its economic implications remain unclear. Understanding costs and cost-effectiveness is essential for guiding resource allocation decisions in these settings.
objectiveTo map the evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of palliative care delivered in RAC homes, and to identify gaps in the evidence base.
methodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Searches were conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, CINAHL and CENTRAL databases. Studies reporting on quantitative economic outcomes of palliative care in RAC settings were included. Findings were summarised using narrative synthesis.
resultsOf the 3182 items identified, 15 studies were included. Three categories of economic outcomes were identified: care delivery costs (n = 3), healthcare system costs (n = 10) and cost-effectiveness outcomes (n = 2). Studies examining care delivery costs reported additional costs associated with palliative care. Among studies assessing healthcare system costs, six reported reduced costs, one reported increased costs and three reported mixed findings varying by time horizon and care continuity. Two full economic evaluations reported favourable cost-effectiveness findings compared with usual care, although the statistical significance of findings varied.
conclusionEconomic evidence on palliative care in RAC remains limited and methodologically heterogeneous, constraining robust conclusions regarding its economic value. Future research should prioritise rigorous economic evaluations that comprehensively capture healthcare and social care costs while incorporating patient-centred outcomes to better assess the value of palliative care in RAC homes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.