SynthesisJAMA network open2026
Variability in the Diagnostic Criteria for Severe Pertussis: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Pertussis, or whooping cough, can be life threatening in infants, yet the concept of severe pertussis remains poorly defined in the literature. Lack of standardization may impair research and public health interventions. Objective: To assess the variability in terminology and criteria used to define severe pertussis in the published literature. Evidence Review: A systematic review of the literature drawn from PubMed and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies involving infants with pertussis that provided a definition for severe pertussis and published from database inception to April 2025 were included without language restrictions. Study characteristics and detailed definitions of severe pertussis were extracted. Variations in terminology and criteria used across definitions were described. Findings: Of the 914 unique studies identified, 133 underwent full-text review, and 78 were included in the study, encompassing 49 observational studies, 22 case reports, 3 case-control studies, and 4 reviews; no randomized clinical trials were included. Five different terms used to define severe pertussis were identified: severe (44 of 78 studies [56%]), malignant (12 of 78 studies [15%]), critical (9 of 78 studies [12%]), fatal (9 of 78 studies [12%]), and fulminant (4 of 78 studies [5%]). Across studies, 22 different criteria were used to define clinical severity, which were classified into 3 categories (ie, clinical, biological, and outcome). The most commonly reported criteria included respiratory failure (40 of 78 studies [51%]), pulmonary hypertension (30 of 78 studies [38%]), leukocytosis (28 of 78 studies [36%]), death (29 of 78 studies [37%]), and intensive care unit admission (29 of 78 studies [37%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review revealed substantial heterogeneity in the definition of severe pertussis in the literature. A consensus-based definition of severe pertussis is urgently needed to improve the understanding of its pathophysiology and to enhance clinical management, clinical research, and public health decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.