Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496974›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immunization Intention During Pregnancy and Infancy.

Rachael M Porter, Ilse Campos, Mohammed Shoaib, Tara M Vogt, Walter Orenstein, Robert A Bednarczyk, Lavanya Vasudevan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachael M PorterHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ilse CamposHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mohammed ShoaibHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tara M VogtNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Walter OrensteinDepartment of Medicine, Pediatrics, Epidemiology and Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robert A BednarczykHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lavanya VasudevanHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is the leading cause of infant hospitalizations in the US. Two immunization options are available to protect infants against hospitalization-maternal vaccination during pregnancy or RSV antibody shot administration for infants after birth. Gaps in immunization coverage suggest missed opportunities to protect infants against RSV-associated hospitalization. Objective: To describe RSV immunization intentions, behaviors, and preferences among pregnant women and parents of young children (ages 0-5 years). Design, Setting, and Participants: For this survey study, 2 concurrent national cross-sectional surveys were implemented in April 2024. Participants were recruited from a representative online survey panel of US adults. Participants were 18 years or older and either pregnant or the parent of a young child. Data were analyzed from May to November 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes of interest were prevalence of positive intention to receive RSV antibody shot for child among pregnant women and parents and prevalence of positive intention to receive RSV maternal vaccine among pregnant women. Results: Of 1765 parents and 174 pregnant women, most were aged 30 years or older (parent: 78.1% [95% CI, 76.2%-80.0%]; pregnant women: 64.0% [95% CI, 56.8%-71.1%]). Among pregnant women eligible for vaccination, 55.5% (95% CI, 47.7%-63.3%) reported a positive intention toward maternal RSV vaccination. Among pregnant women with negative or unsure intention, 35.8% (95% CI, 24.3%-47.3%) would probably or definitely accept RSV vaccination following a strong health care practitioner recommendation. Among parents, 59.8% (95% CI, 57.5%-62.1%) reported a positive intention toward RSV antibody shot administration for their child. Among parents with negative or unsure intention, 27.0% (95% CI, 23.7%-30.2%) would probably or definitely accept the RSV antibody shot for their child following a strong health care practitioner recommendation. More participants preferred maternal vaccination (parents: 48.3% [95% CI, 46.0%-50.6%]; pregnant women: 58.2% (95% CI, 50.9%-65.6%]) over infant RSV antibody shot administration (parents: 9.4% (95% CI, 8.1%-10.8%]; pregnant women: 6.2% (95% CI, 2.6%-9.8%). Top reasons for negative or unsure intentions in both groups included lack of information and safety concerns. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, pregnant women and parents of young children preferred maternal RSV vaccination for protecting infants against RSV infection. For some participants with negative or unsure intentions about RSV immunization, a strong health care practitioner recommendation shifted intention toward accepting immunization. Future research efforts should design and evaluate novel communication strategies for providing information about RSV immunization options to eligible families, in addition to strengthening health care practitioner recommendation in favor of immunization.

Indexed as

IntentionParentsPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnant PeopleRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesVaccinationAdultChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRespiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID42496974
PMCPMC13401208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.