ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2026
En bloc resection of intestinal-type adenoma extending to the minor duodenal papilla by underwater endoscopic mucosal resection with a forward-viewing endoscope.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report successful en bloc underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) of a lesion involving the minor duodenal papilla. A woman in her 60s presented with a 10-mm depressed lesion in the descending duodenum. White-light imaging and Magnifying endoscopy suggested a tumor involving a minor papilla. Although side-viewing endoscopes are conventionally used for the minor papilla, pre-procedural assessment indicated inadequate maneuverability for this specific lesion (ED-580T; Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Consequently, we strategically used a forward-viewing dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2TQ260M; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). Utilizing its right-side instrument channel and independent suction capability provided a direct approach and stable field of view, facilitating precise snaring. Histopathology confirmed a 15 × 13-mm intestinal-type adenoma with negative margins. Given the minor papilla was located at the tumor margin and lacked a luminal orifice, the lesion was diagnosed as a superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor (SNADET) secondarily extending to the papilla. Forward-viewing endoscopes are viable alternatives for this region depending on lesion orientation. Furthermore, comprehensive pre-procedural assessment, including evaluation for pancreas divisum, may aid in determining treatment strategies, such as the omission of pancreatic stenting. Strategic, case-specific endoscope selection is paramount for safe therapeutic intervention in this complex anatomical region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.