ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Deep Learning-Based Lung Cancer Segmentation and Volumetric Analysis Using CT Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent causes of cancer-related deaths in the world, and in this context, accurate estimation of tumor burden and treatment response is critical in clinical decision-making. Traditional radiological assessment techniques, especially linear measurements characterized by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), lack the capacity to reflect the three-dimensional morphology and longitudinal changes of tumors. This has led to a growing clinical need for more detailed and reproducible volumetric analysis frameworks. In parallel with this clinical requirement, deep learning has become an important part of lung cancer imaging, making it possible to achieve automated, reproducible, and volumetrically consistent tumor segmentation of computed tomography scans. Over the past ten years, deep learning architectures, including U-Net-based models and attention-focused variants, hybrid CNN-Transformer models, and multimodal PET/CT strategies, have been proposed. However, even in the context of rapid methodological development, there remains an obvious gap between segmentation accuracy, the ability to extract reliable volumetric biomarkers, and their translation into clinically meaningful assessment models. This survey provides a detailed and systematic review of efficient segmentation and volumetric analysis of lung cancer on CT with the aid of deep learning. Existing research is categorized by architectural design, learning strategy, dataset characteristics, and intended clinical use. Special attention is paid to the relationship between segmentation performance, volumetric reliability, and downstream clinical use of the segments, including measurement of treatment response and longitudinal monitoring of tumors. Publicly accessible datasets such as LIDC-IDRI, RIDER Lung CT, and NSCLC-Radiomics are examined in relation to nodule detection tasks, test-retest reproducibility, and prognostic volumetric modeling. In summary, although deep learning-based volumetric analysis has shown great potential in addressing the shortcomings of linear tumor assessment, several challenges still impede clinical implementation. These include limited data availability, variability in annotation, sensitivity to scanners and acquisition protocols, poor interpretability, and multimodal integration. New research directions, including transformer-based volumetric models, self- and semi-supervised learning, generative modeling of tumor dynamics, and uncertainty-aware systems, are discussed as pathways toward more robust and clinically useful AI-driven lung cancer imaging models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496940What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.