Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496937›Full record

ReviewReproduction & fertility2026

Surrogacy from a reproductive rights and justice perspective: a narrative review.

Margot Lherbet, Samir Hamamah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margot LherbetART Laboratory - University Hospital Center, Arnaud de Villeneuve , Montpellier, France.ORCID 0009-0008-5844-3345
Samir HamamahART Laboratory - University Hospital Center, Arnaud de Villeneuve , Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

graphical abstractABSTRACT: Surrogacy is a form of assisted reproductive technology in which a woman carries a child on behalf of an individual or couple and relinquishes the child following birth. Since its emergence in its contemporary form in the late 1970s, surrogacy has been the subject of ongoing debate and controversy, shaped by developments in scientific research and social discourse. This work proposes a theoretical framework that directly engages with the ethical and practical paradoxes of surrogacy rather than bypassing them. The analysis is grounded in a comprehensive review of 86 scholarly articles drawn from international, cross-disciplinary literature. The aim of this research is to approach surrogacy through a non-binary, socially informed lens, placing surrogates themselves at the center of the inquiry. First, it clarifies the conceptual distinction between reproductive rights and reproductive justice, exploring their respective contributions to surrogacy debates on regulation without oversimplifying the issues or reducing them to binary frameworks. Second, it mobilizes these frameworks to diagnose how surrogates' autonomy, health, and agency are unevenly protected across national and transnational arrangements, focusing on different geographies to illustrate de diversity of surrogacy practices. Third, it critically examines institutional responses - particularly medical, legal, and associational forms of regulation - highlighting both their potential and their limitations in advancing reproductive justice for surrogates. By adopting a cross-disciplinary perspective, this work seeks to reorient the discussion toward the experiences of surrogates and to inform political decision-making concerning assisted reproductive technologies within the context of an expanding global reproductive market. LAY SUMMARY: Surrogacy is when a woman carries a child for someone else and gives the baby to them after birth. While this practice helps people become parents, it also raises complex ethical and social questions. This review looks at 86 studies from different countries and disciplines to better understand these issues. It proposes a new way to think about surrogacy, focusing on the rights and experiences of the women involved, especially surrogates and donors. The study shows that many women, especially in the Global South, face problems such as poor access to healthcare and limited information about the process. It also highlights how medical and legal systems often fail to protect them. By combining ideas from human rights and feminist movements, the review offers a tool to identify these problems and calls for stronger protections. It encourages global rules to ensure that surrogacy respects women's health, rights, and dignity, no matter where they live.

Indexed as

Gestational CarriersReproductive RightsReproductive Techniques, AssistedSocial JusticeSurrogacyFemaleHumansPregnancyARTreproductive justicereproductive rightssurrogacy

Identifiers

PMID42496937
PMCPMC13482798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.