ReviewClinical child and family psychology review2026
Failure to Launch (FTL): A Narrative Review and Call for Research.
Review in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Failure to launch (FTL) is a phrase used to describe abled young adults who live with their parents, are not in school, and are not employed, reflecting difficulties in adult functioning and delayed achievement of expected developmental milestones. Although frequently encountered in clinical settings from parents seeking treatment for their children and themselves, FTL has received little systematic empirical attention in the clinical psychology literature. The present review disentangles FTL from related constructs and highlights the need for a dedicated body of research. First, we define FTL and review findings from one empirical study of FTL adults. Next, we compare FTL to neighboring constructs such as peter-pan syndrome, pathological demand avoidance, "not in education, employment, or training" (NEET), boomerang children, modern-type depression, and hikikomori, emphasizing both points of overlap and distinction. We then review relevant findings from these literatures, including discussion of prevalence rates, correlates, risk factors, and outcomes of related syndromes, with a particular focus on the hikikomori literature. Next, we review existing assessment tools and summarize emerging psychotherapeutic interventions. We conclude by considering how researchers can draw on existing literature to inform future research on FTL youth. Although FTL appears to be a pressing clinical problem, research is necessary to understand its etiology and developmental course and to identify avenues for prevention and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.