ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Shaping surgical decisions: a practical MRI approach to cervical stromal invasion assessment in the post-SHAPE era.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical hysterectomy has historically been the standard surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer, but growing evidence supports less radical approaches in carefully selected low-risk patients. The SHAPE trial demonstrated that simple hysterectomy is noninferior to radical hysterectomy for pelvic recurrence in women with low-risk early-stage disease, while substantially reducing urinary morbidity. Critically, both the SHAPE and ConCerv trials used limited stromal invasion as a key eligibility criterion, embedding depth of stromal invasion (DSI) as a central surgical selection parameter and, for the first time in the case of SHAPE, incorporating MRI-based stromal invasion percentage as a formal trial criterion. This shift has meaningful implications for radiologic practice. Although stromal invasion percentage is not part of FIGO 2018 staging, a reproducible MRI estimate of less than 50% stromal involvement can directly inform eligibility for simple hysterectomy or fertility-sparing surgery. A report limited to tumor size and FIGO stage is no longer sufficient for contemporary multidisciplinary decision-making. In the post-SHAPE era, radiologists are expected to deliver structured, decision-oriented reports that systematically address tumor size, maximal depth of stromal invasion and its estimated percentage, outer stromal rim integrity, parametrial and vaginal status, uterine extension, distance to the internal os, and nodal disease. This review describes how MRI can be optimized and structured to meet this clinical need. We discuss patient preparation, protocol design, and the technical requirements of true oblique axial T2-weighted imaging as the cornerstone of local staging. We detail a stepwise approach to stromal invasion assessment, address common pitfalls that may lead to under- or overestimation of disease extent, and propose a structured reporting checklist to support reproducible, surgically actionable MRI interpretation in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.