ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Machine learning based identification of key production drivers of sheep population in Türkiye: a century-long analysis with multiple imputation techniques.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the first time, this study employs a century-long dataset (1925-2024) to reveal key factors that would be in relationship with sheep population (NSheep) in Türkiye using state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. Due to the existence of missing values in the original dataset, missing observations were addressed through four imputation techniques-Next Observation Carried Backward (NOCB), Mean, MIDASpy, and Random Forest (RF)-generating four distinct datasets for comparative analysis. For revealing the key production factors related with NSheep, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithms were modeled via 5-fold cross-validation and multiple performance metrics (R², MSE, RMSE, MAE, and MdAPE). MLP produced lower prediction errors than XGB across all imputation techniques, though this difference was statistically confirmed only under NOCB and RF imputation (Diebold-Mariano test, P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively); differences under MEAN and MIDASpy imputation were not significant. The highest overall accuracy was achieved by MLP with NOCB imputation (R² = 0.975), while XGB with RF imputation showed the weakest fit (R² = 0.917). Feature importance analyses consistently identified cattle population (NBovine) as the dominant variable associated with NSheep across all four imputation techniques and both algorithms, followed by meadow and pasture area (M&PH) for XGBoost and a more evenly distributed set of variables (M&PH, sheep meat production, goat population) for MLP. Given that NBovine and NSheep both increased steadily over the study period, this association is interpreted as reflecting shared structural growth among livestock subsectors rather than a causal effect of cattle population on sheep numbers. These dataset-specific, associative findings support the value of combining multiple imputation strategies with flexible machine learning algorithms to characterize structural interdependencies in long-term agricultural production data. Future studies incorporating chronologically ordered validation schemes and explicitly modeling structural breaks and policy shifts could further clarify the robustness of these associations, and extending this approach to other livestock species and regions would help establish their broader generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.