ArticleSurgery today2026
Clinical impact of the prognostic nutritional index at listing and immediately before surgery in lung transplantation.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is calculated from the serum albumin concentrations and lymphocyte counts, predicts the outcomes in lung transplantation (LT). This study aimed to investigate the optimal timing for assessing PNI before LT.
methodsWe analyzed 140 brain-dead LT recipients (2015-2023) in this study. The PNI was calculated at the time of transplant listing and immediately before LT. Using a cutoff value of 45, the patients were classified into high/low PNI groups and compared for overall survival. Changes in the PNI trajectories were analyzed.
resultsMultivariable analyses showed that a low PNI independently predicted mortality at listing (hazard ratio [HR], 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-5.53; P = 0.003) and before LT (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.25-4.77; P = 0.009). Patients with a persistently low PNI had a worse survival than those with a persistently high PNI (HR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.62-7.91; P = 0.002), whereas an improvement in the PNI after listing was not significantly associated with survival.
conclusionPNI at both time points significantly predicted post-transplant outcomes. A trajectory analysis highlights the importance of nutritional assessment before listing, although larger studies are required to clarify the effects of nutritional changes after listing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496893What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.