ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Lessons for Health in All Policies implementation from well-being policy approaches: A qualitative analysis of intersectoral collaboration during the development of Canada's Quality of Life Framework.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn the context of widening health and social inequalities and increasingly complex public policy issues, the well-being policy paradigm offers an opportunity for public health to collaborate with non-health sectors to address social and structural determinants of health. The Quality of Life Framework for Canada ("the Framework") is the Canadian federal government's foray into well-being policy and can be considered a Health in All Policies (HIAP) initiative. This case study examines the Framework's development alongside the HIAP model, identifying barriers and facilitators for effective multisectoral action. METHODOLOGY AND
methodsThis work was developed as an applied policy case study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 representatives across 11 federal departments. A qualitative matrix approach and thematic analysis were used to identify success factors, barriers, and opportunities for improvement. The World Health Organization's (WHO) Four Pillars Model for HIAP was used to guide analysis using the HIAP pillars (governance and accountability; leadership at all levels; ways of working; and resources, financing, and capabilities).
resultsMultisectoral action was critical to the success of the Framework's development. Key facilitators included the establishment of interdepartmental governance, a formalized and transparent mandate, and committed leadership. Findings indicated strong alignment with and adoption of HIAP approaches.
conclusionThe findings from this case study illustrate how well-being policy initiatives can be leveraged to advance collaboration for public health equity and determinants of health. Lessons learned are relevant to the work of public health practitioners as well as those working in non-health sectors, including policy-makers and decision-makers, particularly in a government context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.