ArticlePsychological research2026
Attention in depth: perceptual load modulates distractor interference in a three-dimensional space.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although vision is inherently three-dimensional, depth has often been overlooked in the literature on selective attention. The present study examined how perceptual load modulates attentional selection in depth. Fifty participants took part in the study, which was conducted in virtual reality, a recently emerging technique offering precise experimental control of depth. The target always appeared in the middle plane, and the distractor could appear either in the same plane as the target, in front of it, or behind it. The perceptual load was manipulated by defining Go/No-go cues on the basis of either a single feature (low load) or a conjunction of features (high load). The results revealed that under low load, distractors in the front and same planes interfered with performance, whereas distractors in the back plane did not, which is consistent with a viewer-centered attentional gradient. Under high load, distractor interference was eliminated across all depth planes. These findings suggest that increased perceptual load is associated with reduced distractor interference regardless of the distractor's depth plane, although the mechanism underlying this effect remains to be clarified. Overall, these results provide initial evidence for extending Perceptual Load Theory to three-dimensional contexts and highlight the importance of considering depth in models of selective attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.