Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496772›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2026

SACS: A Reproducible, Configuration-Driven Software Framework for Schematic Multi-Region Circuit Simulation and Integrated Analytics.

Eyasu Desalegne Beyene, Erkan Atmaca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eyasu Desalegne BeyeneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Erkan AtmacaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey. erkana@iuc.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational neuroscience projects often combine simulation code, configuration files, analysis scripts, plotting utilities, and provenance records through loosely coupled and difficult-to-replay workflows. SACS is presented as a configuration-driven research-software framework for reproducible schematic multi-region circuit simulation with integrated analytics, validation checks, deterministic execution, deterministic replay, artifact replay, and graphical inspection. Implemented as the Python package brain_sim, the framework converts declarative model and scenario specifications into standardized run directories containing numerical outputs, machine-readable summaries, figure-generation recipes, validation reports, and provenance metadata. The contribution is methodological and neuroinformatics-oriented. SACS is not presented as a biologically validated model of anxiety, brain function, or treatment response, and its built-in circuit materials are used as configurable demonstration components rather than as evidence of clinical or biological validity. Instead, the framework is evaluated as software for reproducible computational experimentation: hypotheses are encoded as explicit configurations, executed under recorded seeds, inspected through analytics and validation layers, and then used to inform subsequent configurations in an iterative workflow. The manuscript describes the software architecture, configuration and execution model, artifact structure, replay mechanisms, and graphical/programmatic interfaces that support this workflow. The central claim is that SACS improves transparency, inspectability, and reuse for schematic circuit experiments by binding configuration, execution, analytics, provenance, and replay within a single software environment.

Indexed as

BrainComputer SimulationModels, NeurologicalSoftwareAnimalsHumansNeurosciencesReproducibility of ResultsComputational neuroscienceNeuroinformaticsReproducibilityScientific softwareSimulation framework

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.