ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
SACS: A Reproducible, Configuration-Driven Software Framework for Schematic Multi-Region Circuit Simulation and Integrated Analytics.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational neuroscience projects often combine simulation code, configuration files, analysis scripts, plotting utilities, and provenance records through loosely coupled and difficult-to-replay workflows. SACS is presented as a configuration-driven research-software framework for reproducible schematic multi-region circuit simulation with integrated analytics, validation checks, deterministic execution, deterministic replay, artifact replay, and graphical inspection. Implemented as the Python package brain_sim, the framework converts declarative model and scenario specifications into standardized run directories containing numerical outputs, machine-readable summaries, figure-generation recipes, validation reports, and provenance metadata. The contribution is methodological and neuroinformatics-oriented. SACS is not presented as a biologically validated model of anxiety, brain function, or treatment response, and its built-in circuit materials are used as configurable demonstration components rather than as evidence of clinical or biological validity. Instead, the framework is evaluated as software for reproducible computational experimentation: hypotheses are encoded as explicit configurations, executed under recorded seeds, inspected through analytics and validation layers, and then used to inform subsequent configurations in an iterative workflow. The manuscript describes the software architecture, configuration and execution model, artifact structure, replay mechanisms, and graphical/programmatic interfaces that support this workflow. The central claim is that SACS improves transparency, inspectability, and reuse for schematic circuit experiments by binding configuration, execution, analytics, provenance, and replay within a single software environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.