ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026
Heme iron intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective analysis of the modifying role of calcium.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAlthough red meat and processed meat are well-established risk factors of colorectal cancer (CRC), the mechanisms underlying this association are less clear. Heme iron, abundant in red and processed meats, is one plausible etiologic factor. In addition, calcium, a well-established independent protective factor against CRC, may prevent heme-induced colorectal carcinogenesis by binding to heme iron in the gut.
methodsWe prospectively examined the association between heme iron and CRC risk and whether these associations differed by calcium intake in the Nurses' Health Study, Nurses' Health Study II and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to calculate cohort-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and pooled results using a fixed-effect model.
resultsWe analyzed data from 211,851 participants and documented 2983 incident CRC cases during up to 36 years of follow-up. Comparing the highest to lowest quintile, the pooled multivariable HRs (95% CIs) for CRC were 1.03 (0.91, 1.17) for total heme iron intake, 1.02 (0.91, 1.16) for heme iron from red and processed meat, and 1.02 (0.90, 1.15) for heme iron from non-red and non-processed meat sources. Total heme iron intake, heme iron from red and processed meat, and heme iron from non-red meat and non-processed meat sources were largely not associated with CRC risk. Moreover, the association between heme iron and CRC did not appear to differ by calcium status.
conclusionOverall, our study does not support a strong role of heme iron intake in CRC risk and suggests that the protective association of calcium intake on CRC risk does not depend on heme iron.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.