Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496674›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Implementing Indicator Condition-Guided HIV Screening Alerts in the Emergency Department: Lessons Learned from a Case Study.

Francisco Fanjul, Maria Dolores Macià Romero, Pablo Fraile, Alexandra Guiu, Antoni Campins, Adrià Ferré, Sophia Pinecki, Melchor Riera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco FanjulInfectious Diseases Unit, Son Espases University Hospital, Palma, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1852-0330
Maria Dolores Macià RomeroHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma, Spain.
Pablo FraileHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma, Spain.
Alexandra GuiuFaculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain.
Antoni CampinsInfectious Diseases Unit, Son Espases University Hospital, Palma, Spain.
Adrià FerréInfectious Diseases Unit, Son Espases University Hospital, Palma, Spain.
Sophia PineckiHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma, Spain.
Melchor RieraInfectious Diseases Unit, Son Espases University Hospital, Palma, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionIndicator condition (IC)-guided HIV testing is recommended internationally as a cost-effective strategy but remains inconsistently implemented, particularly in emergency departments (EDs). Electronic health record (EHR) alerts may improve adherence; however, real-world uptake depends on organizational and specialty-level determinants.MethodsProspective case study conducted between August 2023 and April 2025. A non-interruptive EHR alert was triggered by predefined IC-related laboratory orders and antimicrobial prescriptions. Crucially, the alert was only fired if HIV serology was not already requested, meaning that the accepted tests represented true additional screening. Clinicians could accept or decline testing with a single click. Acceptance patterns were analyzed by age group, clinical service, weekday versus weekend, and diurnal versus nocturnal shifts. The analysis employed descriptive stratification to evaluate confounding between patient age and clinical service volume.ResultsAmong 3,240 alert activations, 523 were accepted (16.1%), resulting in 398 completed tests. Eight patients tested positive (2.01%), including four actionable cases (1.01%). Two declined alerts were followed by subsequent diagnoses of advanced HIV infection. The apparent lower uptake in younger patients was service-level confounded by the concentration of alerts within gynecology/obstetrics (53.7% of all alerts in 18-37-year-olds; global gynecology uptake 3.5%). Outside gynecology, baseline acceptance was consistently higher (15-38%) across all age categories, demonstrating that the apparent age gradient was profoundly confounded by service distribution.ConclusionApparent age-related differences in alert uptake were attenuated after stratification by service distribution rather than intrinsic clinician bias regarding patient age. Specialty culture, workflow alignment, and ownership of preventive tasks appear to be central to the adoption of digital alerts in ED settings.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalHIV InfectionsHIV TestingMass ScreeningAdultEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddecision support systems clinicalemergency service hospitalHIVimplementation scienceindicator conditionsquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID42496674
PMCPMC13400916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.