ArticleJournal of vision2026
Spatial anisotropy in crowding and ensemble perception.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately perceiving the emotions of other people is an important task for the human visual system. Falsely judging a group of people to be happy when they are angry can have major negative consequences. While the effects of surrounding faces on the perception of a target face (crowding) and the perception of ensemble features of face groups (ensemble perception) have been extensively investigated separately, here we investigated how observers perceive the emotion of both individual faces and groups of faces with identical stimuli to better understand the relations of crowding and ensemble perception. In two experiments, we asked observers to report either the emotion of a central face surrounded by eight faces (central task) or the average emotion of all nine faces (averaging task). In both tasks, only one to two faces were strongly weighted compared with the other faces in the group, suggesting a similar number of sampled items across both tasks. However, we found a strong task- and location-dependent asymmetry: in the central task, the central face and the innermost face on the horizontal meridian (closest to fixation) were strongly weighted, whereas in the averaging task, mainly the two innermost faces on the horizontal meridian and in the upper visual field were strongly weighted. The results indicate that the perception of emotions in groups is strongly constrained by anisotropic weighting mechanisms due to discriminability; however, target discriminability alone did not predict weighting, which was modulated by task requirements. We suggest that the visual system optimizes perceptual selection and information integration according to task demands and visual uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.