Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496604›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026

Comparative Biologists and Aerospace Engineers: Important Allies to Explore the Secrets of Natural Flight.

Jasmin C M Wong, Vikram B Baliga, Christina Harvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasmin C M WongSchool of Civil, Aerospace, and Design Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TR, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-2503
Vikram B BaligaDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9367-8974
Christina HarveyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2830-0844

Funding

David and Lucile Packard FoundationSEBSociety for Integrative and Comparative Biology (SICB)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To uncover the principles behind the multifaceted topic of animal flight, we must incorporate perspectives on physics, physiology, ecology, and evolution, themes explored in the "Dinosaurs to Drones: Comparative Approaches to Understanding Flight" symposium. Yet these fields often remain siloed by differences in terminology and approaches. By contrasting evolution and engineering optimization, we highlight how differences between seemingly similar concepts can lead to misunderstandings, and how appreciation of those differences can be leveraged to reveal fundamental flight principles such as multifunctional constraints and adaptive versatility. These principles can then be integrated with conventional optimization methodology to both expand the design space for robust aerial systems and deepen insight into how biology achieves adaptable flight. Finally, drawing on the symposium's panel discussion on how to successfully execute interdisciplinary endeavors, we emphasize the importance of supervisory and institutional support for establishing interdisciplinary training, collaboration, and communication opportunities.

Indexed as

DinosaursFlight, AnimalAnimalsBiological Evolution

Identifiers

PMID42496604
PMCPMC13455361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.