ArticlePediatric reports2026
Surgical Management of a Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevus of the Face-A Technical Case Report and Comparison with Classic and Novel Approaches.
Article in Pediatric reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large congenital melanocytic nevi (LCMN) of the face can pose significant functional, esthetic, and psychosocial challenges in childhood. In selected patients, staged excision offers a practical reconstructive strategy when primary closure is not feasible without distortion of nearby facial landmarks. We report the management of a child with a facial LCMN using a planned multistage surgical approach aimed at lesion removal while preserving contour and minimizing scar burden. The lesion was excised sequentially over three procedures, with careful attention given to relaxed skin tension lines and facial esthetic units. When required, adjunctive reconstruction was performed to optimize closure and support tissue healing. This approach allowed a gradual reduction in the nevus, improved tissue accommodation, and avoidance of excessive tension on the surrounding skin. Postoperative recovery was uncomplicated, and the final esthetic outcome was satisfactory for both the patient and parents. Staged excision was selected over tissue expansion and skin grafting because it allowed progressive lesion reduction while preserving adjacent facial landmarks and minimizing donor-site morbidity. This technical case highlights the importance of individualized surgical planning, preservation of facial esthetic units, and staged scar placement when managing large facial congenital melanocytic nevi in pediatric patients. The educational value of the report lies in illustrating the decision-making process used to balance lesion removal, esthetic outcomes, and long-term surveillance in a challenging facial location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.