ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Universal Dried Blood Spot Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Slovenian National Implementation Pilot.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) is the most common congenital infection and an important cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental impairment, yet many affected infants remain undetected under selective screening approaches. We conducted a prospective national pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of universal dried blood spot (DBS)-based screening for cCMV within the Slovenian newborn screening program. DBS samples collected within 72 h of life were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and screen-positive newborns underwent confirmatory urine PCR within 21 days together with standardized clinical evaluation. Among 5556 screened newborns, 13 (0.23%) screened positive and cCMV was confirmed in 10, corresponding to a lower-bound birth prevalence of 1.80 per 1000 live births (95% confidence interval, 0.98-3.31), because confirmatory testing was limited to DBS-positive newborns. None of the confirmed cases were clinically suspected at birth, and all passed newborn hearing screening. Six infants met protocol-defined criteria for symptomatic cCMV and received valganciclovir. Historical registry-based clinical case ascertainment in Slovenia corresponded to 0.09 detected cases per 1000 live births. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of universal DBS-based cCMV screening within an established newborn screening infrastructure and suggest substantial under-ascertainment under selective clinical detection pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.