ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Newborn Screening in Africa: A Scoping Review.
Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening initiatives have the potential to mitigate childhood morbidity in Africa, but they also have special ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) that are influenced by issues with the health system, cultural diversity, and limited resources. This scoping review explores the ELSI of newborn screening across Africa to identify key challenges, gaps, and future research needs. A systematic search identified 27 peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2025, covering 12 African countries. Data were extracted on study characteristics, disease types, and ELSI dimensions from African Journals Online (AJOL), Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and BMJ Journals. Thematic analysis mapped recurring ethical, legal, and social concerns. Most studies examined ethical and social dimensions, while legal frameworks were rarely addressed. South Africa, Tanzania, and Ghana contributed the largest number of publications. Sickle cell disease (52%) and hearing screening (30%) were the dominant foci. Common ethical issues included informed consent, privacy, and justice; legal gaps centered on the absence of data protection and frameworks; and social concerns involved stigma, awareness, and cultural perceptions of hereditary disease. Ethical and social issues dominate NBS discourse in Africa, whereas legal oversight remains limited. To guarantee fair, reliable, and long-lasting newborn screening programs, national policy guidelines, community involvement, and context-specific ethical frameworks must be strengthened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.