ReviewJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2026
Clarifying Proprioceptive Training: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proprioception is traditionally defined as the perception of joint position and movement, yet contemporary evidence supports a broader view: a multimodal sensorimotor system integrating peripheral afferent input with central motor commands. Despite its recognised importance in rehabilitation and sport, conceptual and methodological inconsistencies persist regarding its definition, assessment and training, and interventions labelled proprioceptive are frequently indistinguishable from general neuromuscular or balance-based exercise. This narrative review, reported in accordance with the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA), critically analyses the current state of knowledge on proprioception and clarifies the concept of proprioceptive training. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched from January 2000 to May 2025, combining "proprioception", "kinaesthesia", "joint position sense" and "force sense" with "definition", "assessment", "training" and "rehabilitation". Sources addressing conceptual foundations, assessment instruments, interventions explicitly labelled proprioceptive, or critical reviews were eligible, with no restriction of body region; studies on balance alone without proprioceptive measurement and non-peer-reviewed material were excluded. Of 1412 records screened, 119 informed the synthesis. Proprioception comprises distinct submodalities-joint position sense, kinaesthesia and force sense-mediated by specific receptors and pathways. Current tools isolate these under artificial conditions with limited ecological validity, and most interventions labelled proprioceptive induce general motor adaptations rather than genuine sensory ones. Submodality-specific operational definitions and ecologically valid assessment tools are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.