ReviewJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2026
Optimizing Athletic Performance: A Systems Framework for Adaptive Training, Load Management, and Decision-Making.
Review in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although athlete monitoring can quantify training exposure and athlete status with increasing detail, conversion into daily training decisions remains inconsistent. This structured narrative review synthesizes evidence on training load, neuromuscular readiness, recovery, fatigue interpretation, measurement reliability, applied decision-making, and proposes the LOAD-R framework: a systems model linking Load, Organism response, Adaptive state, Decision, and Re-evaluation. A transparent non-PRISMA strategy was used because the aim was conceptual integration and framework development rather than effect-size pooling. Evidence was organized around field-applicable monitoring domains and their decision value. LOAD-R builds on existing monitoring approaches by organizing single indicators, fixed thresholds, and dashboard alerts into an explicit interpretation-to-action sequence. It classifies athlete state into adaptive, functional-overload, underloaded, uncertain, or maladaptive zones, each linked to progress, maintain, modify, deload, or recover decisions. The framework also provides implementation levels and testable predictions. By framing monitoring as adaptive decision support rather than passive data collection, LOAD-R may improve decision consistency, reduce maladaptive training responses, and enhance the practical value of athlete monitoring in applied sport settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.