Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496369›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2026

Effects of Pictogram and Typeface Complexity on Visual Attention: Eye-Tracking Study.

Klementina Možina, Dorotea Kovačević, Petra Buljat, Iva Šarčević, Barbara Blaznik, Tanja Medved, Maja Brozović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Klementina MožinaFaculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8277-4186
Dorotea KovačevićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Graphic Arts, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8102-0534
Petra BuljatUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Graphic Arts, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0004-8682-7670
Iva ŠarčevićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Graphic Arts, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Barbara BlaznikFaculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-8913
Tanja MedvedFaculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja BrozovićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Graphic Arts, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-9955-2099

Funding

The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P2-0450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how congruence between pictogram complexity and typographic complexity influences visual processing and perceived appropriateness in multimodal communication. Drawing on theories of visual communication, legibility and aesthetic perception, the study examined whether simple or complex pictograms harmonise more effectively with sans-serif or serif typefaces. Ninety participants viewed stimuli from three thematic categories (cobbler, herbal pharmacy and gluten-free restaurant), while their eye movements were recorded using a Tobii Pro Fusion eye-tracking device. Measures included reading time, fixation count and saccade count, together with subjective evaluations of pictogram-typeface suitability. The results show that reading time was the most sensitive indicator of formal congruence. In the cobbler and gluten-free restaurant categories, simple pictograms increased reading time with sans-serif typography but decreased it with serif typography. In the herbal pharmacy category, simple pictograms and sans-serif typography independently supported faster reading performance. Subjective evaluations showed no significant differences between combinations, indicating that participants perceived all pairings as similarly appropriate despite measurable differences in processing efficiency. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of pictogram-typeface combinations depends on both formal complexity and thematic context. Eye-tracking proved valuable for revealing subtle cognitive processing differences not reflected in subjective judgements.

Indexed as

appealeye-trackingpictogramtypographyvisual design

Identifiers

PMID42496369
PMCPMC13398171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.