ArticleClocks & sleep2026
Melatonin in Clinical Practice: Grey Zones Between Chronobiology, Insomnia and Consumer Supplementation.
Article in Clocks & sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melatonin occupies a paradoxical position in contemporary sleep medicine: despite its physiological role as a regulator of circadian timing, it is frequently used and perceived as a nonspecific "natural" hypnotic. Although melatonin demonstrates modest benefits for sleep initiation and clearer efficacy in circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders, its clinical use is often undermined by diagnostic imprecision, inappropriate dosing, mistimed administration, inconsistent formulations, and inadequate patient counseling. Circadian disorders can be misclassified as primary insomnia, leading to symptomatic treatment approaches that fail to address the underlying phase misalignment. At the same time, supraphysiological doses and reflexive bedtime administration have become normalized despite evidence that melatonin acts primarily as a chronobiotic whose effects depend more on timing than dose. Regulatory inconsistencies and substantial variability in over-the-counter preparations further complicate safe and reproducible use. These factors contribute to avoidable treatment failure, inaccurate labeling of nonresponse, and persistent misconceptions regarding melatonin's mechanism of action. Therefore, melatonin should be approached as a pharmacological intervention requiring the same diagnostic rigor, individualized dosing, and longitudinal assessment expected of other sleep therapeutics, particularly when integrated with behavioral and circadian interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.